CANADA HISTORY - Elections

1963 ELECTION


The 1965 federal election in Canada marked a significant point in Canadian political history, with an intense campaign and a competitive race that ultimately failed to deliver a clear majority government. The election took place on November 8, 1965, less than two years after the previous federal election, and its aftermath had a profound impact on the country's political landscape. The key themes of the election, leadership battles, and party strategies all contributed to shaping the outcome.

Political Situation Before the Election The political environment leading up to the 1965 election was shaped by the 1963 federal election, in which the Liberal Party, led by Lester B. Pearson, managed to form a minority government after a narrow victory over John Diefenbaker's Progressive Conservative Party. Pearson's government had introduced significant policy initiatives during its short time in power, including universal healthcare, the Canada Pension Plan, and a new flag for Canada. Despite these achievements, Pearson's leadership was not universally celebrated, and the government struggled with internal dissent, especially regarding its relationship with Quebec.

Pearson had initially sought to form a strong and stable majority government in 1963, but the Liberals fell short of securing the required seats. This made governance difficult and forced them to rely on support from smaller parties, such as the New Democratic Party (NDP), led by Tommy Douglas, and the Social Credit Party. Pearson hoped that the 1965 election would strengthen the Liberals’ position and provide them with the mandate needed to push forward further reforms.

On the other hand, the Progressive Conservatives, still led by Diefenbaker, were recovering from the divisive internal struggles that followed their 1963 defeat. Diefenbaker was a polarizing figure in Canadian politics. While he had previously enjoyed widespread popularity, by the mid-1960s, his leadership was increasingly questioned by party members, especially after the loss of the 1963 election and the party's continued difficulties in uniting its ranks. Despite these internal conflicts, Diefenbaker remained leader and was determined to regain power.

The New Democratic Party (NDP), under Tommy Douglas, sought to build on the momentum it had gained in previous elections. Douglas, known for his role in establishing universal healthcare in Saskatchewan, was an advocate for social democratic policies at the national level. The NDP’s influence was growing, especially in urban areas and among progressive voters, and it had played a crucial role in supporting Pearson’s minority government.

The Social Credit Party, led by Robert Thompson, was primarily based in Quebec and Western Canada. Its platform focused on economic policies that aimed to address regional disparities, but it struggled to gain significant traction outside its traditional base.

Leaders of the Parties

Lester B. Pearson (Liberal Party) – Pearson had been Prime Minister since 1963 and was a Nobel Peace Prize laureate known for his diplomatic achievements. Although a respected statesman, Pearson was not seen as a particularly dynamic or charismatic leader. His vision for Canada was one of progress, with a focus on creating a welfare state and modernizing the country’s identity. His minority government had introduced key social programs, but his leadership was sometimes criticized as lacking the forceful command needed to achieve a strong majority.

John Diefenbaker (Progressive Conservative Party) – Diefenbaker had served as Prime Minister from 1957 to 1963 and had a reputation as a populist leader who championed the cause of the "ordinary Canadian." However, by 1965, his leadership was widely seen as divisive. He had earned the loyalty of many party supporters through his anti-establishment rhetoric, but his refusal to modernize the party or listen to critics weakened his standing within the Progressive Conservatives. His party was split between those loyal to him and those who believed it was time for new leadership.

Tommy Douglas (New Democratic Party) – Douglas was a charismatic and well-respected leader who had been instrumental in establishing Medicare in Saskatchewan. As leader of the NDP, he aimed to expand social welfare programs at the federal level and represent the interests of working-class Canadians. The NDP positioned itself as the left-wing alternative to the Liberals, hoping to attract progressive voters dissatisfied with Pearson’s more centrist policies.

Robert Thompson (Social Credit Party) – Thompson led a regional party that had its roots in the social credit economic theory, which called for reforming the monetary system to address economic inequalities. The Social Credit Party had seen some success in Quebec and Western Canada but struggled to become a national force. Thompson’s leadership aimed to strengthen the party’s appeal beyond its traditional base.

The Issues of the Election The central issues of the 1965 election revolved around Canada's social and economic future. Pearson’s Liberal government had introduced major reforms, including universal healthcare and the Canada Pension Plan, which were hailed as transformative. However, questions remained about the sustainability of these programs, how they would be funded, and their long-term economic impact.

The role of Quebec in Confederation was also a significant issue. Pearson’s government had overseen the introduction of the new Canadian flag, a move intended to foster national unity. However, tensions between Quebec and the federal government persisted, with the province seeking more autonomy. The Liberals were challenged on their ability to navigate Quebec’s growing nationalist sentiment while maintaining a strong federal government.

Economic concerns were also front and center, particularly regarding inflation, unemployment, and federal spending. The Progressive Conservatives campaigned on a platform of fiscal responsibility, criticizing the Liberals for what they saw as reckless spending on social programs. They argued that a return to Conservative governance would restore balance to the economy and reduce inflation.

The NDP focused on expanding social programs and addressing issues of inequality, pushing for greater investments in healthcare, education, and workers’ rights. They argued that Pearson’s government had not gone far enough in addressing the needs of ordinary Canadians.

Campaign Strategies

Liberal Party Strategy – Pearson and the Liberals ran on a platform of continuing the progress that had been made under their minority government. They emphasized their achievements, including Medicare, the Canada Pension Plan, and the new national flag, framing these policies as steps toward a more just and equitable society. Pearson sought to project an image of steady leadership and competence, while also positioning himself as the best option to manage the evolving relationship between Quebec and the rest of Canada.

Progressive Conservative Party Strategy – Diefenbaker’s campaign focused on criticizing the Liberal government’s economic policies, particularly its spending on social programs. He positioned himself as a defender of fiscal responsibility and warned that unchecked spending would lead to higher taxes and inflation. Diefenbaker’s populist appeal was aimed at Canadians concerned about their economic future, but his leadership style and internal party divisions limited his campaign’s effectiveness.

New Democratic Party Strategy – The NDP, under Tommy Douglas, ran a strong campaign focused on expanding social programs, particularly healthcare and education. Douglas emphasized the need for a more egalitarian society and positioned the NDP as the true progressive alternative to the Liberals. The party's base of support came from urban centers and younger, more progressive voters, but the NDP struggled to gain significant traction in rural areas and Quebec.

Social Credit Party Strategy – The Social Credit Party, led by Robert Thompson, campaigned on regional issues, particularly in Quebec and Western Canada. The party sought to position itself as the defender of regional interests against the perceived dominance of Ontario and Quebec in federal politics. However, the party's platform and economic theories failed to resonate widely, and the Social Credit Party struggled to make significant gains outside its traditional support base.

Election Campaign and Conduct

The 1965 election campaign was vigorous, with all parties vying for votes in a highly competitive environment. The Liberals entered the campaign hoping to turn their minority government into a majority, while the Progressive Conservatives sought to regain the power they had lost in 1963.

Pearson campaigned on his government’s record, particularly its social programs, and promised further reforms if given a majority. He focused his campaign on urban areas, Quebec, and Ontario, where the Liberals had their strongest support. Diefenbaker, meanwhile, targeted rural voters and those concerned with the economy, attacking the Liberals for their spending policies and portraying himself as the champion of the “ordinary Canadian.”

Douglas campaigned heavily on expanding social welfare programs and targeted progressive voters who felt that the Liberals had not done enough to address social and economic inequalities. The Social Credit Party focused its campaign on Quebec and Western Canada but failed to gain significant traction outside these regions.

Election Results and Aftermath

The results of the 1965 federal election were a disappointment for Pearson and the Liberals, as they again failed to secure a majority government. The Liberals won 131 seats, an increase from the 128 they had held previously, but still short of the 133 needed for a majority. The Progressive Conservatives won 97 seats, a small increase from their previous 95 seats, while the NDP won 21 seats, up from 17. The Social Credit Party won 5 seats, a decrease from their previous 13.

The election left Pearson with another minority government, forcing him to continue relying on support from the NDP and other parties to pass legislation. While the Liberals remained the dominant party, the inability to secure a majority reflected a sense of voter dissatisfaction with the status quo. Diefenbaker’s hold on the Progressive Conservative leadership became more tenuous, as many within the party began to call for new leadership to take the party in a more unified and modern direction.

In the aftermath of the election, Pearson continued as Prime Minister but soon faced challenges from both within his party and from the opposition. The NDP, buoyed by their increased seat count, continued to push for more progressive policies, and tensions between Quebec and the federal government remained a central issue in Canadian politics.

The 1965 federal election was significant in that it reinforced the era of minority government in Canada and set the stage for a dramatic showdown within a few years.

Placeholder image

Lester Pearson - Liberal

Placeholder image

John Diefenbaker - Conservative

Placeholder image

RN Thompson Social Credit

Placeholder image

Tommy Douglas - CCF

Election
Party
Elected Members # of Candidates % of Popular Vote % of Seats
1963 (April 8) - Turnout: 79.2 %
Liberal  129 264 41.7 % 48.7 %
Progressive Conservative  95 265 32.9 % 35.9 %
Social Credit  24 224 11.9 % 9.1 %
New Democratic Party  17 232 13.1 % 6.4 %
Other    38 0.4 % 0.0 %
Total 265 1,023    
Government (Liberal / Liberal-Labour)--129, Opposition--136, Minority--7
Total - 265 Conser Liberal NDP/ CCF Social Credit Other
Canada 95 129 17 24 -
Newfoundland - 7 - - -
PEI 2 2 - - -
Nova Scotia 7 5 - - -
New Brunswick 4 6 - - -
Quebec 8 47 - 20 -
Ontario 27 52 6 - -
Manitoba 10 2 2 - -
Saskatchewan 17 - - - -
Alberta 14 1 - 2 -
BC 4 7 9 2 -
Yukon 1 - - - -
NWT 1 - - - -

Cite Article : Reference: www.canadahistory.com/sections/documents/documents.html

Source: NA



Placeholder image
Placeholder image