CANADA HISTORY - DOCUMENTS WAR

1939 Neville Chamberlain Peace in Our Time Speech

Analysis of the Document - (The Document follows below the Analysis)

Neville Chamberlain’s "Peace in Our Time" speech, delivered on September 30, 1938, following the signing of the Munich Agreement, is often remembered as a symbol of failed appeasement. Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister, returned from Munich after negotiations with Adolf Hitler and announced that Britain had avoided war by allowing Germany to annex the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia. This agreement was hailed by Chamberlain as a triumph of diplomacy over conflict, embodying his belief that concessions would bring lasting peace to Europe.

The implications of this speech were far-reaching, both globally and within the context of Canadian history. Initially, the speech was met with widespread relief in Britain, and even in Canada, which shared close ties to Britain and the Commonwealth. Chamberlain's speech fostered a sense of optimism among Canadians, who hoped that the specter of another world war had been averted. Canada, having played a significant role in World War I, was wary of being drawn into another global conflict, particularly one that was brewing in Europe once again. Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King, like Chamberlain, believed that diplomatic negotiations could prevent war, and he publicly supported the Munich Agreement, reflecting the general sentiment in Canada at the time.

However, the long-term consequences of Chamberlain's speech and the Munich Agreement would reshape both British and Canadian foreign policy. The policy of appeasement, which Chamberlain so fervently defended, collapsed within a year when Germany invaded Poland in 1939, triggering World War II. In Canada, the failure of appeasement led to a re-evaluation of the country's defense policies and its role in global affairs. Canada, under Mackenzie King's leadership, found itself reluctantly drawn into the conflict when Britain declared war on Germany in September 1939. Although Canada had its own sovereign decision to make, it joined the war alongside Britain a week later, marking a critical moment in the nation's development as an independent actor on the world stage.

Chamberlain's speech also had implications for Canadian unity. At the time, Canada was still grappling with the political and cultural divisions between English and French Canadians, particularly when it came to issues of foreign policy and military involvement. The idea of entering another European war was unpopular in French-speaking Quebec, where there was strong opposition to conscription and the prospect of Canadian soldiers fighting in a British-led conflict. Chamberlain's speech, initially viewed as a triumph of diplomacy, may have briefly alleviated these tensions by suggesting that war could be avoided. However, when war inevitably broke out, the divisions within Canada resurfaced, leading to significant internal strife, particularly around conscription during the later years of the war.

Moreover, the failure of appeasement and Chamberlain’s subsequent resignation in 1940 influenced the future direction of Canadian foreign policy. After the war, Canada emerged as a proponent of collective security and multilateral diplomacy, key components of the post-war international order. The creation of the United Nations, in which Canada played a pivotal role, was driven by the desire to avoid the diplomatic failures of the 1930s, including the Munich Agreement. Canada's experience in the war, and the lessons learned from Chamberlain's ill-fated policy of appeasement, informed its commitment to peacekeeping and active participation in international organizations in the years that followed.

In conclusion, Chamberlain's "Peace in Our Time" speech holds a significant place in the annals of Canadian history. While it initially reflected the hopes of both Britain and Canada for a peaceful resolution to European tensions, it ultimately became a symbol of the failure of appeasement and the inevitability of war. For Canada, the speech underscored the complexities of its relationship with Britain and the growing realization of its own role as an emerging middle power. As a result, the lessons learned from the Munich Agreement and Chamberlain's policy of appeasement shaped Canadian foreign policy for decades to come, emphasizing the importance of collective security, diplomacy, and international cooperation.


Placeholder image

[The following is the wording of the statement that Neville Chamberlain waved when he stepped off the plane after the conference in Berlin had ended on 30 September, 1939.]

"We, the German Fuehrer and Chancellor, and the British Prime Minister, have had a further meeting today and are agreed in recognizing that the question of Anglo-German relations is of the first importance for two countries and for Europe. "We regard the agreement signed last night and the Anglo-German Naval Agreement as symbolic of the desire of our two peoples never to go to war with one another again.

"We are resolved that the method of consultation shall be the method adopted to deal with any other questions that may concern our two countries, and we are determined to continue our efforts to remove possible sources of difference, and thus to contribute to assure the peace of Europe."

Chamberlain read this statement to a cheering crowd in front of 10 Downing St. and said; "My good friends this is the second time in our history that there has come back from Germany to Downing Street peace with honor. I believe it is peace in our time."


Cite Article : www.canadahistory.com/sections/documents/war/war.html

Source: from Schirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich



Placeholder image
Placeholder image